Love, Simon (trailer) came out in theaters this weekend. I almost never see movies in the
theater, but when I heard about this movie about a week ago, I knew I wanted to
see it. Part of me (maybe a generally submerged part) is a sappy romantic. The
movie is a comedic teen romance, and as several critics point out, is predictably
scripted as per the genre. However it seemed to offer something almost
surprisingly unique for a mainstream film – a gay central character.
Simon, 17, lives a
relatively affluent suburban life with a happy nuclear American family and a
group of close supportive high school friends. He’s carried the secret of his
sexual orientation for several years, but one day learns from a friends that
there is another, anonymous kid at his school. Boldly he strikes up a
conversation on-line with “Blue” and gradually the two anonymous boys confide
in each other and grow closer. Neither knows the other’s identity, and Simon
spends much of the movie wondering if this guy or that is Blue. Events soon
become more complicated when a scheming classmate captures screenshots of
Simon’s conversations and threatens to out Simon if Simon doesn’t set the boy
up with one of his friends. Eventually Simon is outed against his will, two
bullies openly taunt him at school, friends who feel betrayed by his behavior become
distant, and Blue retreats, not ready to be out himself.
Each of these setbacks is
reversed in time. His friends return. The bullies are thoroughly reprimanded at
school. Christmas morning he comes out to his parents who offer warm support. And
he finally meets Blue in a sappy Hollywood
climax. It’s not a necessarily overly creative movie plot-wise, but the acting
is passable to good, and comedy adds balance to the awkward and more serious
moments of the film.
Unfortunately there is
likely to be some pushback about this movie. Anytime the actually-normal
normalcy of gay life is portrayed publicly there are some who
take that as an opportunity to decry the downfall of the family and other
sordid evils that will befall America
because there was a short non-sensual gay kiss in a mainstream movie. Hollywood will get
attacked; the “gay agenda” will be denounced; and stern moral warnings may flow
from some people who frankly probably make God (should s/he exist or even give a
damn) ashamed to be associated with them.
One of the perks of the
film is the portrayal of gay life as very average most of
the time. It is not all flashy, flamboyant, and queer theory. One sympathetic reviewer
called it quite “vanilla”, but noted that that wasn’t necessarily bad,
especially since vanilla might be all the general heterosexual masses in
polarized America
might be ready for. At upwards of 4% of the population, and youth claiming
non-heterosexuality at perhaps even higher rates, being LGBT is quite normal. The normalcy on
non-heterosexuality will rustle some feathers, but it is not only factually
accurate, but is a necessary social perspective for our society to be more
equal and inclusive.
The film dealt with some
issues that a straight romantic film couldn’t, one being the collateral damage
of the closet. We suspect earlier in the movie, and learn definitively later,
that one of Simon’s best friends is in love with him. A life-long thoughtful
friend, her heart is broken when she learns that Simon doesn’t see her that way
and he tries to set her up with another mutual friend. The innocence with which
Simon is unaware of her feelings for him could be the experience of any naïve
teen, but it is practically a hallmark of young gay men oblivious to the interest
of their female friends. The movie plays on the stereotypical, though probably
at least partly true, theme that the innocence and romantic distance of young
gay guys seems to attract the girls’ interest even more. Unfortunately for the
straight female friend, like other closeted gay boys, Simon is daydreaming
about guys.
Though not particularly
well developed in the movie, Love, Simon
also deals with the struggle of self acceptance that is one universal ritual
that precedes the (voluntary) coming out experience. Really, Simon has the most
ideal environment possible for coming out – he lives in upper middle class
comfort, has warm open-minded loving parents, good looks, and fits comfortably
in his high school social world. Even so, he struggles with coming out for some
time, and it is only through meeting another closeted student on-line that he
begins the process. In fact, the two help each other break the secrecy and
isolation of the closet in a mutually-affirming way. This mirrors my own coming out experience, and
probably that of many others – through connection with other LGBT people, we
break the isolation that fuels the fear that suppresses self-acceptance.
For straight audiences,
hopefully the film offers a few minutes of reflection about what the struggle
for self-acceptance can be like and the transformation that occurs between regarding
sexuality as a combustible secret and a personal asset. The movie takes a
minute to take a playful jab at the fact that straight people never have to
come out to their families or friends. I might add that while straight youth thereby
dodge the discomfort of the process, perhaps they lose something in life experience
by not having to deeply confront who they really are and how authentically they
want their inner reality to match their outer persona.
For Simon to come out, it
meant exchanging the safety of his false heterosexual image (or asexual image
at best) for the freedom to be himself at all times and in all places. The
exchange of safety for liberation almost invariably comes with a cost in the
real world, but for Simon it is transient and minimal in the film. In short, he
had it way easier than when I went to high school and probably easier than many
kids today in certain communities.
No comments:
Post a Comment